As I posted on 4/9 on the Forum, we erred in our draft of the Restrictive Covenants and reversed the definition of R-1 and R-2 under Rationale for Modification on page 2 of the Proposed Changes. The error has been corrected and the updated page posted on the website now reads:
“Designated three categories of properties within Tower Shores:
R-1 (single-family homes and duplexes)
R-2 (condominiums and town houses)
The proposed language in Paragraph 5-G in page 5 “grandfathers in units that may not be in compliance”. This was written this way to exempt those units not currently in compliance with required setbacks ie: Atlantic Watergate buildings A & B from having to comply with setback requirements if destroyed and rebuilt.
Similarly, paragraph 5-H stipulates that single family homes, if destroyed, would have to comply with the setbacks as defined in the Restrictive Covenants.
Thanks again for your careful read of the proposed language.